Forum Topic

Meet Clive.  He was sent out by LBH in response to calls that a hole had appeared in the road surface.  To an untrained person it looked as if the hole was quite deep.  Clive thought so too, then said he would apply a ‘technical’ test.Clive said the only H&S consideration of this test was that he had to take care his chin did not hit the road surface when he put the broom handle into the hole.The result was road closure and the opportunity for us to hold a very successful street party.Taking a leaf out Clive’s training manual I decided to apply my own technical test to CHR and the marked up hole, long forgotten by the person who marked it up as LBH’s responsibility.There are agreed intervention times and measurements, which should be challenged.  Intervention levels ought to be discussed too as seemingly it is women who fall more often than men, maybe because they have smaller feet.  Intervention levels were set at a time in History when you could walk across most cracks and place your foot firmly on a safe slab.  Nowadays people negotiate their way across crazy paving and often find difficulty in finding a safe place to put a foot down.Conversations with officials – lets face it they know all this anyway – experience and the proof in these photos shows they don’t work.My untrained understanding of a busy High road requiring intervention more quickly than a less busy road lies in the ‘use’ of the pavement and definition of ‘busy’.  A larger variety of uses might mean more chance of somebody falling over on damage to the surface.  Here is a current example.When I went to take the above photo there was a workers van parked in the slip road (perfectly reasonable short term offloading) but it meant that pedestrians were walking towards the edge of the pavement and being directed towards the hole.  One of the builders said he had already tripped down the hole.  The following demonstrates exactly what was happening and is not staged.

Sarah Felstead ● 6105d

s.If someone were checking how this all works for the pedestrians safety, it would be worthwhile exploring how areas established as requiring intervention, are marked up and whom the marking is for.Hopefully the idea of a partnership and liability is to lesson the odds of an accident for the pedestrian, so once a hazard has been notified to the street people, and they have surveyed the area how are other pedestrians warned?  At present it appears they are not a part of this consideration and are left to take their chances?  The mark up appears to give directions from the engineer to the labourers, and not much else.  Is the pedestrian at the forefront of the ‘trained persons’ mind?Once an area is marked up the odds on some ‘untrained’ public-spirited person calling the job in, also lesson as everyone thinks it is being dealt with (take the kerb stone outside the bank for instance).  Surely it could be argued that the trained person and Council takes on greater responsibility for dealing with it and making sure paper work is turned into a job card and that the job card actually produces the work for which it is intended and to time, before somebody falls under a car or simply breaks an ankle?What the pedestrian might see last SaturdayWhat the trained person/PA/street cleaner using the street would see, again last SaturdaySome marking up has gone on here during the week the 10 inch hole couldn’t be considered very urgent as this was last Saturday and weeks busiest shopping day.I think the white line will show up in the dark lessoning the odds of an after dusk accident.What will the pedestrian out for a stroll see here?  What do you see here?  The guy in the cycling jacket?You didn’t spot these marked up rockers then?Still there last SaturdayA £2 coin gives some perspective

Sarah Felstead ● 6116d

Dear Chris - you believe? Are you stating this as a fact having seen the area, or are you relying on what you have been told (from verbal or written records) hoping this is true?Amongst the number of issues discussed ‘on tour’ was the standard of workmanship – both from utility companies, builders and the Councils own contractors.  One of my neighbours described work he had witnessed being done by LBH, as making two jobs out of one.When Satbir Gill and David Palmer came out I took them to some very substandard work as an example and one piece was so bad Satbir had to phone somebody to come out and rectify the work immediately.  Not only did we hold conversations about it – and I had photographs – but I could also show them new sub standard work.  Who is responsible for quality control?  Who, knowing there are/were issues with some work follows the issue through to make sure it doesn’t happen again?Back to this particular scenario.1.10.2008You can see the dip which probably caused the accident?5.10.2008The area is still marked up as needing attention.  A puddle has formed covering the hazard.Where does the Councils responsibility lie having identified a severe hazard where an accident has occurred?The area is one of the most urgent response areas on CHR – main road and extra H&S potential to throw a pedestrian into the path of oncoming traffic.  It is still not closed off – in this photo - who has the report/documentation/admin responsibility?Is this marked up area an assessment of the situation and allocation of funds to work on the area made by a trained individual?  Are they called street engineers?  Is this a title or a specific requirement of training to be called this?  What is LBH’s expectation of a street ‘engineer’?  The person who marked the site up should have taken photos? So a discussion could have been held with a trained individual to agree urgency.Whoever marked the hazard up – missed a bit.11.10.08A week later a busy Saturday morning.  The path was closed to protect the cement but as it was dry by now – arrangements could have been made to remove it before the shopping day?

Sarah Felstead ● 6123d